Mark Leeper
2021-03-04 15:21:56 UTC
Martin Gardner once wrote a book about what he called the "Aha!-
experience." That is the instant in problem solving when all the
pieces of the puzzle fit together and everything makes sense.
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE was an entire TV series designed to create
"Aha!" experiences. In each episode the main characters knew
exactly what they were doing, but until the end the viewer was
confused. Then at the end everything fit together.
Don't look for that sort of scripting in the current Tom Cruise
"Mission Impossible" series or at least look for it in the current
"Ocean's 11" series, which seems to leave the viewer guessing until
the end of the story.
The Coen Brothers' BLOOD SIMPLE is sort of the dual of TV's MISSION
IMPOSSIBLE. It is a film about the "Huh?" experience. Through
most of the convoluted plot, it is the viewer who knows what is
going on and the characters keep finding out that they only
*thought* they knew what was happening. With the exception of the
moments when the plot twists, it is really easy to keep track of
what is happening. Yet, like RASHOMON, each character has a
different understanding of who is doing what to whom. The plot can
just be described as slow chaos punctuated with moments of
delicious confusion from the characters.
This is a film of very high production values which looks as if it
was printed on cheap film stock. Somehow the film stock gives it a
gritty feel of authenticity that a slick production would lack.
There are some incredible camera shots in this film and it is
amazing that they do not feel contrived. It is like reading Victor
Hugo: the first time you read a paragraph, you are amazed at how
well-written it is, and only secondarily you realize that it really
did advance the plot. Scenes in this film are amazing in the same
way.
One scene toward the end of the film is particularly haunting. We
are in a dark room and someone is shooting holes in the wall from a
well-lit room. The effect is one of columns of light sprouting out
of a dark wall. The scene fits naturally into the plot, but still
is an unforgettable image. The effect was used again in SILVERADO.
In some way I still do not understand, the cameraman is
unobtrusively able to make the viewer notice props that will be
important later. A prop will become important in the plot and the
viewer finds himself thinking, "Yes, I noticed that prop five
minutes ago, but it was in a corner of the screen and I thought
noticing it was my idea."
I rate this a low +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.
Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086979/reference>
What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blood_simple>
--
Mark R. Leeper
experience." That is the instant in problem solving when all the
pieces of the puzzle fit together and everything makes sense.
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE was an entire TV series designed to create
"Aha!" experiences. In each episode the main characters knew
exactly what they were doing, but until the end the viewer was
confused. Then at the end everything fit together.
Don't look for that sort of scripting in the current Tom Cruise
"Mission Impossible" series or at least look for it in the current
"Ocean's 11" series, which seems to leave the viewer guessing until
the end of the story.
The Coen Brothers' BLOOD SIMPLE is sort of the dual of TV's MISSION
IMPOSSIBLE. It is a film about the "Huh?" experience. Through
most of the convoluted plot, it is the viewer who knows what is
going on and the characters keep finding out that they only
*thought* they knew what was happening. With the exception of the
moments when the plot twists, it is really easy to keep track of
what is happening. Yet, like RASHOMON, each character has a
different understanding of who is doing what to whom. The plot can
just be described as slow chaos punctuated with moments of
delicious confusion from the characters.
This is a film of very high production values which looks as if it
was printed on cheap film stock. Somehow the film stock gives it a
gritty feel of authenticity that a slick production would lack.
There are some incredible camera shots in this film and it is
amazing that they do not feel contrived. It is like reading Victor
Hugo: the first time you read a paragraph, you are amazed at how
well-written it is, and only secondarily you realize that it really
did advance the plot. Scenes in this film are amazing in the same
way.
One scene toward the end of the film is particularly haunting. We
are in a dark room and someone is shooting holes in the wall from a
well-lit room. The effect is one of columns of light sprouting out
of a dark wall. The scene fits naturally into the plot, but still
is an unforgettable image. The effect was used again in SILVERADO.
In some way I still do not understand, the cameraman is
unobtrusively able to make the viewer notice props that will be
important later. A prop will become important in the plot and the
viewer finds himself thinking, "Yes, I noticed that prop five
minutes ago, but it was in a corner of the screen and I thought
noticing it was my idea."
I rate this a low +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.
Film Credits:
<https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086979/reference>
What others are saying:
<https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blood_simple>
--
Mark R. Leeper