Growing old together sure beats growing old alone.
Why?
Very simply, to take upon an impossibility, a non sequitur -- as alone
one will not, cannot stand to exist, so as to fertilize oneself,
mature to ingrain conception, et alia -- all apart customary
considerations, (the Judeo-Christian pact reconciling a herd dominance
of animalism to the greater faculty civilization attends), for the
setting for finding oneself alone, nevertheless, to phenomenally
within such likelihood, by degrees respectively of greater confidence
-- [viz as] abstractly to extrapolate [such that] -- 37% American
children do not grow up with both biological parents -- the lowest
figure in the Western world, within subsets consisting of 43.7% of
custodial mothers and 56.2% of custodial fathers either separated or
divorced;- Or, initiators for 60-70 percentile of divorces, being
women, withal for monies men then account by 80% of finances to raise
children [from divorces];- Whereas within rigid scientific disciplines
to claim, after 2-8 years the hormonal constituents of love decays;-
Although, of course, money and incompatibility are also latent if not
contiguous factors beside screwing around;- For what emerges most
oddly, in that males, perhaps increasingly bitten males, across all
ages, do exhibit a greater overall propensity not to marry, now-a-days
(sic, since 30 years ago), whereas the corollary to a number of
females either apt, or not, to marry remains an indistinguishable
constant.
--
The law condemns and punishes only actions within certain definite and
narrow limits; it thereby justifies, in a way, all similar actions
that lie outside those limits. -Leo Tolstoy
